
Authentication Matters: Building Trust and Engagement with USA Today
Overview
Role: Lead UX/UI Researcher, Designer, and Strategist
Duration: 3 months
Methods: Survey (n=43), user interviews, competitive analysis, prototyping, user testing
Tools: Figma, Adobe, Qualtrics, 11Labs
Barrier Analysis
According to users, the largest barriers in authentication were trust and perceived value.
Trust dominates: 48% spam concerns, 27% legitimacy, 23% privacy
Perceived value is low: Rewards motivate action but not sustained behavior
Behavioral Segmentation
Based on the lack of engagement, I decided to evaluate what users actually valued from their reading experience. Personas were based on how different groups were engaging with the platform.
Passive Scanners: Infrequent users, may skim headlines or articles. Incentives unlikely to convert.
Habitual Readers: Repeat visitors, moderate consistency. Value reinforcement shifts behavior.
Goal-Oriented Users: Visit for specific topics, dedicated and consistent. Strong candidates for structured rewards.



Decision Model
Perceived value is determined by a user's evaluation of cost and benefit. I evaluated what factors influenced a user's decisions throughout the discovery process, and how you may measure effectiveness throughout.
Opportunity Areas
To gather overall sentiments, I conducted a survey (n=42). As a part of the survey, users were shown firs -draft prototypes. Users reported being most motivated by rewards, but did not like the presentation.

Opportunities:
Build trust: Highlight privacy & data usage
Reinforce engagement: Reward meaningful behavior, not clicks
Preserve credibility: Avoid intrusive gamification
Personalize & scale: Reward tiers integrated with subscription model
Design Principles:
Editorial credibility first
Reward depth over frequency
Minimal cognitive disruption
Transparent rewards & privacy
Scalable system design
In response to user data, I reworked rewards to be less intrusive to the user experience. This included better integrating activations and points earned.

Rewards Flow
User Journey:
Homepage: Minimal sign-up, privacy messaging
Article: Subtle reward indicator, transparent points
Post-Article Confirmation: Positive feedback immediately
Dashboard: Clear tier visibility, earned vs potential rewards
Rewards work as a positive feedback mechanism encouraging increased user interaction:

Prototypes
After reworking key rewards features, user responded overwhelmingly positive. 84% of users said they would use the rewards feature. Key elements included:
Homepage: Minimal sign-up, text includes transparency in data usage.
Article: Subtle reward indicator, transparent points.
Post-Article Confirmation: Positive feedback immediately.
Dashboard: Clear tier visibility, earned vs potential rewards are visible.
Next Steps: Metrics and Validation
If this feature were to be implemented, I would evaluate my hypothesis with the following metrics and methodology:
Rewards increase authentication: Use authentication rates and A/B testing.
Rewards increase engagement: Use number of interactions (articles read, time taken) and look at overall user results.
Rewards improve retention: Look at user engagement over 30 days.
Rewards are sustainable: Model cost per authenticated user.
Next Steps:
Longitudinal validation with user cohorts
Explore intrinsic motivation mechanisms
Integrate rewards with subscription model
Test alternative interaction methods (crosswords, polls, quizzes)
Reflection
Trust is a key barrier; transparency and privacy messaging is critical, especially for journalistic purposes.
Incentives must reinforce meaningful behavior.
Editorial integrity should guide UI decisions.
Behavioral reasoning improves system-level product design.




